Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/php/session/sess_a1sbhrelb6fgtqojp87ceemm1q, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 242

Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/php/session) in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 242

Warning: fopen(/home/ukiweg.net/public_html/cache//13d7a5182a13b584a08b575d1f479d42): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 665
Newsom's White House chances undermined by tepid California poll - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

If Gavin Newsom wants to be president, he’s got work to do — starting at home

A man with dark hair, in a dark jacket, holds a hand to his forehead beneath a cloudy sky.
A new poll offers unhappy news for California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s presidential prospects. He insists he’s not even thinking of running, though his actions suggest otherwise.
(Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times )
  • His standing in a recent California poll pales compared with other Democratic governors mentioned as 2028 contestants
  • A Golden State return address could be more of a hindrance than help if Newsom runs.

The Newsom for President bandwagon hit another rut this week.

A new poll by the L.A. Times and UC Berkeley found California’s registered voters believe — by a margin of more than 2 to 1 — the state’s gallivanting governor is more focused on boosting his chances of winning the White House than fixing the multitude of problems facing him here at home.

Which is not great news if you believe the best credential when seeking a new job is high praise for the one you’re doing.

Those surveyed were decidedly mixed on Newsom, with a tepid 46% approving of his performance in his second and final term. (Presumably few, if any of them, have listened to Newsom’s unctuous political podcast.) The same percentage of registered voters said they disapprove of his job performance.

Advertisement

That’s not a great look compared with other Democratic governors swirling about the 2028 gossip mill.

Pennsylvania voters give their chief executive, Josh Shapiro, a healthy 59% approval rating and Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer gets favorable marks from 54% of her constituents. Kentucky’s Andy Beshear boasts a positively gaudy 68% approval rating in his deep-red state, the highest of any Democratic governor in the country, according to Morning Consult’s nationwide survey.

Two L.A. Times columnists debate the merits, and demerits, of the California’s governor podcasting side gig. He’s certainly attracted national attention — much of it critical.

Of course, Newsom insists he’s not even thinking about running for president, though a simple application of the duck test — if it waddles and quacks like a duck, you can be reasonably certain of its waterfowl status — suggests otherwise.

Advertisement

In a recent interview with video podcaster Mark Halperin, the governor insisted he’s more undecided about a 2028 run than people think.

“I have to have a burning why, and I have to have a compelling vision that distinguishes myself from anybody else. Without that, without both ... I don’t deserve to even be in the conversation,” Newsom said.

All the while very purposefully thrusting himself into the conversation — which is sort of like someone stripping naked, standing in a department store window, then asking why everyone is staring.

Advertisement

But whatever.

The good news for Newsom is that California voters probably won’t have an opportunity to weigh in on his presidential candidacy, should he run, until well into the nominating contest. Come March 7, 2028 — the date currently set for the state’s presidential primary — California will almost certainly continue its 50-plus years of having very little bearing on the outcome.

Maybe next century.

The full 2028 political calendar has yet to be determined. In 2024, Democrats shook things up at the behest of President Biden, eliminating their kickoff caucuses in Iowa and pushing South Carolina and Nevada to the fore. More changes may be coming, though New Hampshire, which has held the first presidential primary for more than a century, may very well hang on to its lead-off spot, which might not be a bad thing for Newsom.

Jim Demers, a lobbyist in Concord — the state capital — and a longtime Democratic activist, said California’s governor stands as decent a shot as any Democrat thinking of running.

“Whether it’s Gavin Newsom, or [Illinois Gov.] JB Pritzker, or Shapiro or Whitmer or [New Jersey Sen. Cory] Booker — whoever — people are ready to hear them out and want to see who’s going to really be willing to take Trump on and stand up,” said Demers, who’s so far neutral in the contest.

Newsom, he said, is “pretty much a blank slate” in New Hampshire. “The average person really doesn’t know that much about him, other than they know of him.”

What’s more, Demers doesn’t see Newsom’s California return address as necessarily a detriment.

Advertisement

“You probably will have Republicans who’ll paint a California candidate as being a lefty liberal,” Demer said. “But I think you have a lot of Democrats ... who look at many of the policies that have occurred in California and see them as maybe progressive, but forward thinking.”

Dick Harpootlian is certainly no Republican. He’s a former South Carolina Democratic Party chairman, state senator and veteran of decades of presidential politics.

His tongue is sharp and pungent, like the vinegar-pepper barbecue sauce favored in parts of his state and — though, he too, has no early favorite — Harpootlian had little good to say about California’s governor, or his 2028 prospects.

“I think Gavin Newsom is what all of us think of when we think of a slick, wealthy California playboy kind of guy,” Harpootlian said from his law office in Columbia. “I mean, his hair is perfectly coiffed. His shoes are shiny, and probably Italian.

“Many of us,” he went on, “remember during COVID when he was telling everybody not to go out and he was having a fabulous dinner at the French Laundry in Napa. I just think he’s out of touch with the blue-collar folks we need to get back in the [Democratic] Party.

Nor, Harpootlian suggested, is California a particularly good place to hail from politically. He cited the state’s “huge homeless population,” its tent cities, looming budget deficit and taxes that “are so freaking high.”

Advertisement

“It’s not,” he said dryly, “a model the rest of the country wants to follow.”

Conversations with an assortment of residents show most have no clue who’s running in 2026. But they want someone fully committed to the job and not treating the governorship as a stepping stone to the White House.

Iowa has probably lost forevermore its privileged place on the political calendar after the disastrous 2020 caucuses, which took days to yield a winner.

Still, Democratic strategist Jeff Link has a practiced eye from observing scores of presidential candidates pass through over the years. He worked for half a dozen of them.

“I don’t think 2024 helped the California cause,” Link said of the chances Democrats would turn, after Kamala Harris, to another San Francisco-bred Democrat, as their nominee. “But I don’t think it’s a death sentence.”

Newsom might arrive in Iowa toting some baggage. (Assuming he shows up as a presidential hopeful.) But “there is real credibility in governing a state of that magnitude, even if it’s seen as too liberal and too quirky at times,” Link said from Des Moines. “I think people would be open to learning more.”

Which suggests a Newsom tilt at the White House is not entirely far-fetched.

Assuming he first gets his own house in order.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • A majority of California voters (54%) believe Governor Gavin Newsom is prioritizing his presidential ambitions over state responsibilities, with only 26% viewing him as focused on governance[1][2]. Despite this, his approval rating remains steady at 46%, reflecting a polarized electorate[1][2].
  • Newsom’s national visibility efforts—including a podcast, debates with Republican leaders, and legal challenges to Trump-era tariffs—are framed by his administration as part of his duty to protect California’s interests[1][2]. His spokesperson asserts his focus remains on state issues like wildfire recovery and housing[1].
  • Some Democratic strategists argue Newsom’s California governance offers a “forward-thinking” model, with policies on healthcare and climate that could resonate nationally. His team highlights his willingness to challenge Trump in court as a strength[1][2].

Different views on the topic

  • Critics, including Democratic figures like former South Carolina Party Chair Dick Harpootlian, dismiss Newsom as a “slick, wealthy California playboy” out of touch with working-class voters, citing his 2020 French Laundry incident as emblematic[2][3]. Others argue California’s homelessness crisis, budget deficits, and high taxes make it a poor political blueprint[2][3].
  • Progressive Democrats criticize Newsom for moderating his stance on issues like transgender athletes’ participation in sports and supporting felony charges for soliciting minors, which diverges from party orthodoxy[2]. Conversely, conservatives lambast his policies, such as expanding healthcare for undocumented immigrants, as fiscally irresponsible[2][3].
  • Polls indicate nearly 60% of Californians oppose a Newsom presidential run, with skeptics questioning his electability in a national race and warning that his candidacy could harm Democratic prospects[3]. Some commentators suggest his alignment with California’s “liberal” reputation might alienate swing-state voters[2][3].

Advertisement
Advertisement